feat/tailwind-trial #2513
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Blocks
#2622 WIP: feat/tailwind-general-settings
vikunja/vikunja
Reference: vikunja/vikunja#2513
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "dpschen/vikunja:feat/tailwind-trial"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
🤔 I tested something… still unsure if this makes sense.
@ -5,3 +5,3 @@
>
<input
:id="checkboxId"
:id="id || internalId"
ups #fixme
Still not a fan of tailwind. But really not a fan of bulma…
At least tailwind is close to CSS. With bulma there are these huge unnecessary boilerplate div soups with controlling classes.
WTF is that:
5fc5fdd8ff
toff7befc634
Hi dpschen!
Thank you for creating a PR!
I've deployed the frontend changes of this PR on a preview environment under this URL: https://2513-feat-tailwind-trial--vikunja-frontend-preview.netlify.app
You can use this url to view the changes live and test them out.
You will need to manually connect this to an api running somewhere. The easiest to use is https://try.vikunja.io/.
This preview does not contain any changes made to the api, only the frontend.
Have a nice day!
ff7befc634
to8c977030d3
@ -5,3 +5,3 @@
:loading="loading"
>
<div class="field">
<div class="tw-grid tw-grid-cols-[1fr_2fr] tw-gap-3 tw-mb-3">
Wouldn't this be a great opportunity to extract the input field into a separate component?
I'd like to separate that from the tailwind integration.
My original goal was to change the grid a bit. But with bulma it was so hard / wrong, because of the necessary dom structure…
@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
/** @type {import('tailwindcss').Config} */
module.exports = {
We should also disable the preflight because it will interfer with Bulma's reset.
Or better yet, disable Bulma's reset, but that's probably a bigger change.
Good point.
I didn't see much difference, but who knows…
Done.
8c977030d3
toa3eb97ff2b
a3eb97ff2b
to0a38f8c221
0a38f8c221
to83c56eead8
83c56eead8
toada3ad1c2e
ada3ad1c2e
to3df6fca941
3df6fca941
to73046893f0
WIP: feat/tailwind-trialto feat/tailwind-trial@konrad This now only includes adding tailwind support.
The origin of the CI issue was rooted in the missing separation between checkbox and label (currently not possible as individual components). This has nothing to do with tailwind. Will add a new branch (based on this here) for those changes.
🥳