chore(deps): update dev-dependencies #2330
No reviewers
Labels
No Label
dependencies
duplicate
help wanted
invalid
kind/bug
kind/feature
needs reproduction
question
security
wontfix
No Milestone
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: vikunja/vikunja#2330
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "renovate/dev-dependencies"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
This PR contains the following updates:
20.12.8
->20.12.10
2.4.5
->2.4.6
0.20.2
->0.21.0
14.7.1
->14.10.1
1.76.0
->1.77.0
Release Notes
vuejs/test-utils (@vue/test-utils)
v2.4.6
Compare Source
What's Changed
get
vsfind
behavior by @KatWorkGit in https://github.com/vuejs/test-utils/pull/2422New Contributors
Full Changelog: https://github.com/vuejs/test-utils/compare/v2.4.5...v2.4.6
evanw/esbuild (esbuild)
v0.21.0
Compare Source
This release doesn't contain any deliberately-breaking changes. However, it contains a very complex new feature and while all of esbuild's tests pass, I would not be surprised if an important edge case turns out to be broken. So I'm releasing this as a breaking change release to avoid causing any trouble. As usual, make sure to test your code when you upgrade.
Implement the JavaScript decorators proposal (#104)
With this release, esbuild now contains an implementation of the upcoming JavaScript decorators proposal. This is the same feature that shipped in TypeScript 5.0 and has been highly-requested on esbuild's issue tracker. You can read more about them in that blog post and in this other (now slightly outdated) extensive blog post here: https://2ality.com/2022/10/javascript-decorators.html. Here's a quick example:
Note that this feature is different than the existing "TypeScript experimental decorators" feature that esbuild already implements. It uses similar syntax but behaves very differently, and the two are not compatible (although it's sometimes possible to write decorators that work with both). TypeScript experimental decorators will still be supported by esbuild going forward as they have been around for a long time, are very widely used, and let you do certain things that are not possible with JavaScript decorators (such as decorating function parameters). By default esbuild will parse and transform JavaScript decorators, but you can tell esbuild to parse and transform TypeScript experimental decorators instead by setting
"experimentalDecorators": true
in yourtsconfig.json
file.Probably at least half of the work for this feature went into creating a test suite that exercises many of the proposal's edge cases: https://github.com/evanw/decorator-tests. It has given me a reasonable level of confidence that esbuild's initial implementation is acceptable. However, I don't have access to a significant sample of real code that uses JavaScript decorators. If you're currently using JavaScript decorators in a real code base, please try out esbuild's implementation and let me know if anything seems off.
⚠️ WARNING ⚠️
This proposal has been in the works for a very long time (work began around 10 years ago in 2014) and it is finally getting close to becoming part of the JavaScript language. However, it's still a work in progress and isn't a part of JavaScript yet, so keep in mind that any code that uses JavaScript decorators may need to be updated as the feature continues to evolve. The decorators proposal is pretty close to its final form but it can and likely will undergo some small behavioral adjustments before it ends up becoming a part of the standard. If/when that happens, I will update esbuild's implementation to match the specification. I will not be supporting old versions of the specification.
Optimize the generated code for private methods
Previously when lowering private methods for old browsers, esbuild would generate one
WeakSet
for each private method. This mirrors similar logic for generating oneWeakSet
for each private field. Using a separateWeakMap
for private fields is necessary as their assignment can be observable:This prints
true false
because this partially-initialized instance has#x
but not#y
. In other words, it's not true that all class instances will always have all of their private fields. However, the assignment of private methods to a class instance is not observable. In other words, it's true that all class instances will always have all of their private methods. This means esbuild can lower private methods into code where all methods share a singleWeakSet
, which is smaller, faster, and uses less memory. Other JavaScript processing tools such as the TypeScript compiler already make this optimization. Here's what this change looks like:Fix an obscure bug with lowering class members with computed property keys
When class members that use newer syntax features are transformed for older target environments, they sometimes need to be relocated. However, care must be taken to not reorder any side effects caused by computed property keys. For example, the following code must evaluate
a()
thenb()
thenc()
:Previously esbuild did this by shifting the computed property key forward to the next spot in the evaluation order. Classes evaluate all computed keys first and then all static class elements, so if the last computed key needs to be shifted, esbuild previously inserted a static block at start of the class body, ensuring it came before all other static class elements:
However, this could cause esbuild to accidentally generate a syntax error if the computed property key contains code that isn't allowed in a static block, such as an
await
expression. With this release, esbuild fixes this problem by shifting the computed property key backward to the previous spot in the evaluation order instead, which may push it into theextends
clause or even before the class itself:Fix some
--keep-names
edge casesThe
NamedEvaluation
syntax-directed operation in the JavaScript specification gives certain anonymous expressions aname
property depending on where they are in the syntax tree. For example, the following initializers convey aname
value:When you enable esbuild's
--keep-names
setting, esbuild generates additional code to represent thisNamedEvaluation
operation so that the value of thename
property persists even when the identifiers are renamed (e.g. due to minification).However, I recently learned that esbuild's implementation of
NamedEvaluation
is missing a few cases. Specifically esbuild was missing property definitions, class initializers, logical-assignment operators. These cases should now all be handled:capricorn86/happy-dom (happy-dom)
v14.10.1
Compare Source
👷♂️ Patch fixes
Storage.entries()
,Storage.keys()
andStorage.values()
work according to spec - By @motss in task #1418v14.10.0
Compare Source
🎨 Features
Document.elementFromPoint()
- By @TreyVigus in task #1400null
as Happy DOM doesn't support rendering and can't calculate an element's position based on where it is renderedv14.9.0
Compare Source
🎨 Features
Document.queryCommandSupported()
- By @btea in task #1411v14.8.3
Compare Source
👷♂️ Patch fixes
Element.insertBefore()
not removing comment node from previous ancestor - By @mdafanasev in task #1406v14.8.2
Compare Source
👷♂️ Patch fixes
HTMLCollection
instead ofNodeList
inDocument.forms
- By @jean-leonco in task #1349v14.8.1
Compare Source
👷♂️ Patch fixes
DOMRect
interface - By @domakas in task #1161DOMReactReadOnly
interface - By @domakas in task #1161v14.8.0
Compare Source
🎨 Features
HTMLIFrameElement.srcdoc
property - By @jeffwcx in task #1398sass/dart-sass (sass)
v1.77.0
Compare Source
Configuration
📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).
🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.
This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.
Hi renovate!
Thank you for creating a PR!
I've deployed the frontend changes of this PR on a preview environment under this URL: https://2330-renovate-dev-dependencies--vikunja-frontend-preview.netlify.app
You can use this url to view the changes live and test them out.
You will need to manually connect this to an api running somewhere. The easiest to use is https://try.vikunja.io/.
This preview does not contain any changes made to the api, only the frontend.
Have a nice day!
52d8e6ce73
to1b53d07762
1b53d07762
toe58d10bc72